VMOT vs. QVAL
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL).
VMOT and QVAL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VMOT is a passively managed fund by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC that tracks the performance of the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index. It was launched on May 3, 2017. QVAL is a passively managed fund by EMPIRICAL FINANCE LLC that tracks the performance of the QVAL-US - Alpha Architect Quantitative Value Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2014. Both VMOT and QVAL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VMOT or QVAL.
Correlation
The correlation between VMOT and QVAL is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VMOT vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VMOT:
0.64
QVAL:
0.81
VMOT:
0.99
QVAL:
1.21
VMOT:
1.15
QVAL:
1.14
VMOT:
0.65
QVAL:
1.60
VMOT:
4.83
QVAL:
4.41
VMOT:
2.66%
QVAL:
2.72%
VMOT:
20.17%
QVAL:
14.91%
VMOT:
-34.71%
QVAL:
-51.49%
VMOT:
-9.23%
QVAL:
-7.12%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VMOT having a 10.91% return and QVAL slightly higher at 11.02%.
VMOT
10.91%
-3.20%
3.54%
11.53%
2.12%
N/A
QVAL
11.02%
-2.74%
3.33%
10.09%
9.59%
7.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMOT vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VMOT vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VMOT vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison
VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than QVAL's 1.69% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 3.72% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.92% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.26% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.22% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
VMOT vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and QVAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VMOT vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) have volatilities of 4.15% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.