PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMNFX vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMNFX vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMNFX achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 10.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VMNFX has underperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 5.04%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.41% annualized return.


VMNFX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.75%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.84%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
5.04%

LVHD

1D
0.64%
1M
3.86%
YTD
10.95%
6M
10.48%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMNFX vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
12.24%9.27%5.78%12.23%13.48%23.24%-11.58%-9.57%0.60%-4.89%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.95%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VMNFX and LVHD is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.02

The correlation between VMNFX and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.02 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMNFX vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMNFX
LVHD

Financial Services

19.9%
8.6%

Healthcare

13.6%
4.6%

Technology

13.0%
5.9%

Industrials

12.9%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
6.8%

Real Estate

7.6%
15.0%

Basic Materials

5.6%

-

Energy

4.7%
6.7%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.8%

Utilities

3.4%
25.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
18.5%

Financial Services

VMNFX
19.9%
LVHD
8.6%

Healthcare

VMNFX
13.6%
LVHD
4.6%

Technology

VMNFX
13.0%
LVHD
5.9%

Industrials

VMNFX
12.9%
LVHD
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VMNFX
12.7%
LVHD
6.8%

Real Estate

VMNFX
7.6%
LVHD
15.0%

Basic Materials

VMNFX
5.6%
LVHD

-

Energy

VMNFX
4.7%
LVHD
6.7%

Communication Services

VMNFX
3.6%
LVHD
3.8%

Utilities

VMNFX
3.4%
LVHD
25.5%

Consumer Defensive

VMNFX
3.0%
LVHD
18.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMNFX vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMNFX
VMNFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VMNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VMNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMNFX vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMNFXLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.23

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

2.16

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

5.43

+6.71

VMNFX vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMNFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMNFX and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMNFX vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMNFX drawdown since its inception was -26.42%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMNFX and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMNFXLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.42%

-37.32%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-6.17%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.44%

-14.29%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.75%

-16.75%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.09%

-37.32%

+12.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.07%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-4.04%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.46%

-0.80%

Volatility

VMNFX vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) is 1.65%, while Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that VMNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMNFXLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

3.54%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.57%

6.96%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.71%

9.77%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

12.91%

-5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

15.52%

-9.13%

VMNFX vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMNFX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMNFX vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

VMNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than LVHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.27%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
VMNFX
Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares
3.13%3.53%5.61%5.09%0.75%0.16%0.81%3.16%0.94%1.07%0.38%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMNFX and LVHD have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to VMNFX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMNFX dropped -26.42% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

VMNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMNFX and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer