PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMBS vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMBS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMBS achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VMBS has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 1.35%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


VMBS

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.85%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*
1.35%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMBS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.66%8.36%1.70%5.34%-11.90%-1.28%3.76%6.19%0.91%2.47%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VMBS and VUG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

-0.01

The correlation between VMBS and VUG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMBS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMBS
VMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMBS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMBSVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.69

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

5.92

+2.76

VMBS vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMBS and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMBSVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.77

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.68

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.85

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.62

-0.16

Drawdowns

VMBS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMBS drawdown since its inception was -17.47%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMBS and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMBSVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-50.68%

+33.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-16.53%

+13.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.65%

-22.85%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-35.61%

+18.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.47%

-35.61%

+18.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-1.51%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-7.09%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

4.71%

-3.91%

Volatility

VMBS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) is 1.62%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that VMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMBSVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

3.83%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

12.11%

-8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

15.84%

-11.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

22.22%

-15.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

21.44%

-16.04%

VMBS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMBS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMBS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.19%4.20%3.94%3.31%2.35%1.02%2.01%2.77%2.72%2.16%2.10%2.12%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMBS and VUG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VMBS (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMBS dropped -17.47% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.26% vs 1.35% for VMBS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VMBS has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 1.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VMBS.

VMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

VMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VMBS tracks Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VMBS and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMBS and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer