PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMBS vs. JMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMBS vs. JMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMBS achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly higher than JMBS's -0.47% return.


VMBS

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-0.45%
YTD
-0.12%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
1.21%
ALL TIME*
2.03%

JMBS

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.51%
6M
-1.06%
YTD
-0.47%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.93M$27.70M$29.57M
$62.70M$62.14M$62.59M

VMBS vs. JMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
-0.12%8.36%1.70%5.34%-11.90%-1.28%3.76%6.19%1.81%
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
-0.47%8.82%1.53%5.66%-11.40%-0.32%5.80%7.11%1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VMBS and JMBS is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.86

The correlation between VMBS and JMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMBS vs. JMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMBS
VMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBS
JMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMBS vs. JMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMBSJMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.44

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

3.93

+0.67

VMBS vs. JMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the JMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMBS and JMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMBS vs. JMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMBS drawdown since its inception was -17.47%, roughly equal to the maximum JMBS drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMBS and JMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMBSJMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-16.68%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-3.05%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

-6.67%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.09%

-16.64%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-2.61%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

-3.85%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.12%

-0.18%

Volatility

VMBS vs. JMBS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMBS) have volatilities of 1.17% and 1.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMBSJMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

1.21%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

3.48%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

4.30%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.80%

6.54%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

5.50%

-0.08%

VMBS vs. JMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMBS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than JMBS's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMBS vs. JMBS - Dividend Comparison

VMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than JMBS's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMBS
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.30%5.03%5.53%4.38%2.73%1.16%2.92%3.63%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
3.88%4.20%3.94%3.31%2.35%1.02%2.01%2.77%2.72%2.16%2.10%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VMBS and JMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JMBS has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to VMBS (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMBS dropped -17.47% vs JMBS's -16.68%.

On 5-year performance, JMBS leads with 0.44% vs 0.25% for VMBS. On fees, VMBS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMBS has performed better with a 0.44% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VMBS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for JMBS.

JMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 3.88% for VMBS.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VMBS and 0.32% for JMBS.

JMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMBS and JMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer