VLXVX vs. PALDX
VLXVX (Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, VLXVX returned 10.05%/yr vs 9.32%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VLXVX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.
Performance
VLXVX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLXVX achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's 7.39% return.
VLXVX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- —
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 20.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
VLXVX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLXVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund | 11.37% | 21.44% | 14.37% | 20.40% | -17.41% | 16.46% | 16.18% | 24.97% | -7.94% | 6.06% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 7.39% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLXVX and PALDX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between VLXVX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLXVX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
VLXVX
PALDX
VLXVX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund (VLXVX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VLXVX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.49 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 3.43 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.63 | 16.27 | -2.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VLXVX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.59 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.77 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.80 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
VLXVX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLXVX drawdown since its inception was -31.42%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLXVX and PALDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLXVX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.42% | -26.16% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -5.96% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.53% | -16.06% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -20.47% | -4.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -0.46% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -4.09% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.25% | +0.76% |
Volatility
VLXVX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund (VLXVX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 2.31%. This indicates that VLXVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLXVX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 2.31% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 6.18% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.43% | 7.91% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 12.11% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 12.69% | +3.00% |
VLXVX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLXVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VLXVX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
VLXVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than PALDX's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.05% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% |
VLXVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund | 1.80% | 2.00% | 2.11% | 2.06% | 2.00% | 1.93% | 1.60% | 1.90% | 1.85% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VLXVX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VLXVX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to PALDX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLXVX dropped -31.42% vs PALDX's -26.16%.
PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLXVX and PALDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer