VLUE vs. IEFA
VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) and IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VLUE returned 14.56%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for IEFA. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VLUE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IEFA.
Performance
VLUE vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 43.48% return, which is significantly higher than IEFA's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, VLUE has outperformed IEFA with an annualized return of 14.56%, while IEFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.38% annualized return.
VLUE
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- 35.25%
- YTD
- 43.48%
- 1Y
- 71.63%
- 3Y*
- 29.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.64%
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $895.79M | $960.37M | $950.39M | |
| $165.60M | $255.80M | $278.61M |
VLUE vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 43.48% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 9.45% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 26.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLUE and IEFA is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.72 |
The correlation between VLUE and IEFA shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VLUE vs. IEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VLUE
IEFA
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VLUE
IEFA
Financial Services
VLUE
IEFA
Consumer Cyclical
VLUE
IEFA
Communication Services
VLUE
IEFA
Industrials
VLUE
IEFA
Healthcare
VLUE
IEFA
Consumer Defensive
VLUE
IEFA
Energy
VLUE
IEFA
Utilities
VLUE
IEFA
Real Estate
VLUE
IEFA
Basic Materials
VLUE
IEFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLUE vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank
VLUE
IEFA
VLUE vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLUE | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.21 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.98 | 1.54 | +6.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.87 | 5.85 | +22.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLUE vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, which is greater than IEFA's maximum drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and IEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLUE | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.47% | -34.78% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -11.50% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -13.76% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.12% | -30.41% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.47% | -34.78% | -4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -2.00% | -2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -6.63% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.02% | -0.44% |
Volatility
VLUE vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) at 4.00%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLUE | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 4.00% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 13.48% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 15.55% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 16.59% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 17.02% | +2.98% |
VLUE vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VLUE vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison
VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than IEFA's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.41% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.44% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLUE and IEFA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to IEFA (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs IEFA's -34.78%.
On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 14.56% vs 9.38% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 14.56% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VLUE.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 1.44% for VLUE.
VLUE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.07% for IEFA.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLUE and IEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer