VITL vs. QDTE
VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock, while QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past year, VITL returned -64.18% vs 26.73% for QDTE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VITL vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -58.74% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 12.40% return.
VITL
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- 23.18%
- 6M
- -55.31%
- YTD
- -58.74%
- 1Y
- -64.18%
- 3Y*
- 6.86%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- YTD
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 26.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VITL vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -58.74% | -15.26% | 98.37% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.40% | 19.32% | 17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between VITL and QDTE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.13 |
The correlation between VITL and QDTE shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VITL vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
VITL
QDTE
VITL vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VITL | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.27 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 2.63 | -3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 9.81 | -11.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VITL vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VITL | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -22.86% | -61.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.20% | -10.20% | -74.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.85% | -3.74% | -71.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.78% | -3.12% | -44.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.31% | 2.73% | +50.58% |
Volatility
VITL vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 16.31% compared to Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 7.02%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VITL | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.31% | 7.02% | +9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.03% | 14.19% | +35.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.01% | 17.35% | +45.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.53% | 19.06% | +35.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.77% | 19.06% | +34.71% |
Dividends
VITL vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 46.23% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VITL and QDTE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (16.31%) compared to QDTE (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VITL and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer