VITL vs. NUKZ
VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, VITL returned -67.42% vs 31.62% for NUKZ. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VITL vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -68.50% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 7.72% return.
VITL
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- -68.50%
- 6M
- -68.29%
- 1Y
- -67.42%
- 3Y*
- -10.77%
- 5Y*
- -15.28%
- 10Y*
- —
NUKZ
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 31.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VITL vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -68.50% | -15.26% | 156.22% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 7.72% | 56.57% | 62.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between VITL and NUKZ is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.14 |
The correlation between VITL and NUKZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VITL vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
VITL
NUKZ
VITL vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VITL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.19 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.92 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 4.79 | -6.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VITL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 1.05 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | 1.63 | -1.99 |
Drawdowns
VITL vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and NUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VITL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -33.03% | -51.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.20% | -16.51% | -67.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.81% | -10.27% | -70.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.28% | -6.02% | -41.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.12% | 6.62% | +40.50% |
Volatility
VITL vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 18.45% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 10.20%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VITL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.45% | 10.20% | +8.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.11% | 22.61% | +25.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.49% | 30.26% | +31.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.16% | 32.82% | +21.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.74% | 32.82% | +20.92% |
Dividends
VITL vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VITL and NUKZ have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to NUKZ (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VITL and NUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer