VITL vs. FLCH

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock, while FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, VITL returned -6.89%/yr vs -4.30%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VITL vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -56.92% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's -9.29% return.

VITL

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: 32.18%
• 6M: -52.96%
• YTD: -56.92%
• 1Y: -63.21%
• 3Y*: 8.81%
• 5Y*: -6.89%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -14.48%

FLCH

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: 1.65%
• 6M: -12.52%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 1Y: -3.28%
• 3Y*: 9.28%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITL vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	-56.92%	-15.26%	140.22%	5.16%	-17.39%	-28.64%	-27.69%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-9.29%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	14.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VITL and FLCH is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020	0.13

The correlation between VITL and FLCH shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VITL vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITL

VITL Risk / Return Rank: 10
VITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
VITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
VITL Omega Ratio Rank: 6
VITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VITL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 8
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITL vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VITL	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	-0.17	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.73	-0.10	-1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	0.99	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	-0.15	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	-0.34	-0.84

VITL vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITL Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITL and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VITL vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	VITL	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.20%	-62.09%	-22.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.20%	-21.48%	-62.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.20%	-25.43%	-58.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.20%	-52.45%	-31.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.75%	-36.06%	-37.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.81%	-30.61%	-17.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.72%	9.77%	+43.95%

Volatility

VITL vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.16%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VITL	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.40%	6.16%	+10.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.11%	14.05%	+36.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.17%	19.88%	+43.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.54%	29.62%	+24.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.75%	27.82%	+25.93%

Dividends

VITL vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.39%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
VITL Vital Farms, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VITL and FLCH in my portfolio?

VITL and FLCH have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VITL or FLCH?

VITL has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to FLCH (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.