PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VIS vs. VONE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VIS vs. VONE

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while VONE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIS returned 14.85%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for VONE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VONE.

Performance

VIS vs. VONE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly higher than VONE's 9.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIS having a 14.85% annualized return and VONE not far ahead at 15.46%.

VIS

1D
0.66%
1M
5.89%
YTD
19.57%
6M
17.53%
1Y
33.16%
3Y*
23.08%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
14.85%

VONE

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.31%
YTD
9.48%
6M
9.01%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIS vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF		19.57%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF		9.48%17.21%24.51%26.41%-19.14%26.49%20.95%31.12%-4.84%21.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VIS and VONE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.85

The correlation between VIS and VONE shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VIS vs. VONE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VIS
VONE

Industrials

90.2%
9.2%

Technology

4.2%
33.9%

Utilities

3.8%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
10.3%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.9%

Energy

0.2%
3.7%

Basic Materials

0.1%
2.0%

Communication Services

0.0%
10.9%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.2%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Industrials

VIS
90.2%
VONE
9.2%

Technology

VIS
4.2%
VONE
33.9%

Utilities

VIS
3.8%
VONE
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VIS
1.1%
VONE
10.3%

Financial Services

VIS
0.2%
VONE
11.9%

Energy

VIS
0.2%
VONE
3.7%

Basic Materials

VIS
0.1%
VONE
2.0%

Communication Services

VIS
0.0%
VONE
10.9%

Real Estate

VIS
0.0%
VONE
2.2%

Healthcare

VIS
0.0%
VONE
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

VIS

-

VONE
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Industrials ETF

Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF

Often compared with VIS:
VIS vs. XLIVIS vs. VOOVIS vs. FIDUVIS vs. VGTVIS vs. VINAXVIS vs. IYJVIS vs. PRN
Often compared with VONE:
VONE vs. VONGVONE vs. VOOVONE vs. IWBVONE vs. VONVVONE vs. SPYVONE vs. VTHRVONE vs. VWUSX

Return for Risk

VIS vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
VONE
VONE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIS vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VISVONEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.93
2.08

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.71
2.84

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.94

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

13.14

-1.92

VIS vs. VONE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the VONE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIS and VONE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIS vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than VONE's maximum drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and VONE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VISVONEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.51%

-34.66%

-28.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-8.85%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-19.06%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.96%

-25.12%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

-34.66%

-7.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.67%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-3.90%

-4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.98%

+0.98%

Volatility

VIS vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) at 4.51%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VISVONEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

4.51%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

9.76%

+4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

12.52%

+4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

17.16%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

18.29%

+2.21%

VIS vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VIS vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison

VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than VONE's 1.03% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF		0.85%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF		1.03%1.07%1.20%1.40%1.59%1.16%1.45%1.65%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

VIS and VONE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIS has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to VONE (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs VONE's -34.66%.

On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 15.46% vs 14.85% for VIS. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VONE has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 14.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VIS.

VONE has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.85% for VIS.

VIS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VONE is Large Cap Blend Equities. VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VIS and 0.08% for VONE.

VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIS and VONE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer