VIOO vs. QQQS
VIOO (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF) and QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - VIOO tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index while QQQS tracks the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VIOO returned 14.74%/yr vs 16.56%/yr for QQQS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIOO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQQS.
Performance
VIOO vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIOO achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 29.47% return.
VIOO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
QQQS
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 29.47%
- 6M
- 33.29%
- 1Y
- 88.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIOO vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | 16.37% | 6.04% | 8.48% | 16.16% | 3.86% |
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | 29.47% | 23.03% | 10.20% | -1.94% | 6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIOO and QQQS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VIOO and QQQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIOO vs. QQQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIOO
QQQS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VIOO
QQQS
Industrials
VIOO
QQQS
Technology
VIOO
QQQS
Consumer Cyclical
VIOO
QQQS
Healthcare
VIOO
QQQS
Real Estate
VIOO
QQQS
-
Energy
VIOO
QQQS
Basic Materials
VIOO
QQQS
Communication Services
VIOO
QQQS
Consumer Defensive
VIOO
QQQS
Utilities
VIOO
QQQS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIOO vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank
VIOO
QQQS
VIOO vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIOO | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 3.30 | -1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 4.07 | -1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.48 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 6.59 | -2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.17 | 22.06 | -8.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIOO | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 3.30 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.65 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
VIOO vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIOO drawdown since its inception was -44.15%, which is greater than QQQS's maximum drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOO and QQQS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIOO | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.15% | -38.06% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.77% | -13.63% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.93% | -34.32% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.86% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -13.28% | +5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 4.07% | -1.45% |
Volatility
VIOO vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) is 4.40%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that VIOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIOO | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 7.11% | -2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 18.58% | -6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 26.84% | -9.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 28.34% | -6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.99% | 28.34% | -5.35% |
VIOO vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIOO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VIOO vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison
VIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than QQQS's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | 2.69% | 3.48% | 0.80% | 0.68% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIOO Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF | 1.17% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.51% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.32% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIOO and QQQS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQS has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to VIOO (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOO dropped -44.15% vs QQQS's -38.06%.
On 3-year performance, QQQS leads with 16.56% vs 14.74% for VIOO. On fees, VIOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VIOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 16.56% return vs 14.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQQS.
QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.17% for VIOO.
VIOO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIOO and 0.20% for QQQS.
QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIOO and QQQS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer