PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOO vs. VTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOO vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOO achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than VTWO's 18.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIOO having a 10.87% annualized return and VTWO not far behind at 10.85%.


VIOO

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.56%
6M
15.04%
YTD
21.54%
1Y
35.81%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
12.46%

VTWO

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.08%
6M
12.79%
YTD
18.91%
1Y
37.17%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
10.85%
ALL TIME*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.61M$8.65M$9.93M
$175.65M$196.25M$231.49M

VIOO vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
21.54%6.04%8.48%16.16%-16.26%26.79%11.47%22.68%-8.65%13.16%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
18.91%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOO and VTWO is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VIOO and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOO vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOO
VTWO

Financial Services

17.1%
17.6%

Industrials

15.6%
14.1%

Technology

15.6%
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
9.2%

Healthcare

12.2%
20.2%

Real Estate

7.6%
6.7%

Energy

4.9%
5.4%

Basic Materials

4.7%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
2.6%

Communication Services

3.2%
2.2%

Utilities

1.8%
2.7%

Financial Services

VIOO
17.1%
VTWO
17.6%

Industrials

VIOO
15.6%
VTWO
14.1%

Technology

VIOO
15.6%
VTWO
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOO
13.2%
VTWO
9.2%

Healthcare

VIOO
12.2%
VTWO
20.2%

Real Estate

VIOO
7.6%
VTWO
6.7%

Energy

VIOO
4.9%
VTWO
5.4%

Basic Materials

VIOO
4.7%
VTWO
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

VIOO
4.2%
VTWO
2.6%

Communication Services

VIOO
3.2%
VTWO
2.2%

Utilities

VIOO
1.8%
VTWO
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOO vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VIOO
VIOO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VIOO vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIOOVTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.14

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

11.17

+2.03

VIOO vs. VTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the VTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOO and VTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIOO vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOO drawdown since its inception was -44.15%, which is greater than VTWO's maximum drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOO and VTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOOVTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.15%

-41.19%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-10.99%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.93%

-27.57%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.93%

-31.88%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.15%

-41.19%

-2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-3.04%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-8.32%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.09%

-0.53%

Volatility

VIOO vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF (VIOO) is 3.46%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that VIOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOOVTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.79%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

14.10%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.41%

19.35%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

22.43%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

23.06%

-0.12%

VIOO vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIOO vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison

VIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, which matches VTWO's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
1.12%1.36%1.48%1.47%1.51%1.16%1.09%1.37%1.32%1.11%1.06%1.26%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.11%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VIOO and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWO has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to VIOO (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOO dropped -44.15% vs VTWO's -41.19%.

On 10-year performance, VIOO leads with 10.87% vs 10.85% for VTWO. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VIOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIOO has performed better with a 10.87% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VIOO.

VIOO and VTWO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.12%.

VIOO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VIOO and 0.06% for VTWO.

VIOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOO and VTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer