PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOG vs. FSGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOG vs. FSGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOG achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than FSGS's 1.27% return.


VIOG

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.86%
YTD
15.37%
6M
13.49%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
10.83%

FSGS

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.27%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOG vs. FSGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
15.37%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%22.49%19.68%21.16%-4.57%10.58%
FSGS
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
1.27%2.41%6.38%15.98%-13.17%25.56%10.26%21.31%-11.92%10.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOG and FSGS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.85

The correlation between VIOG and FSGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOG vs. FSGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOG
FSGS

Technology

19.7%
18.8%

Industrials

19.5%
22.0%

Healthcare

14.6%
16.7%

Financial Services

13.7%
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
8.0%

Real Estate

6.6%
0.9%

Energy

4.1%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
5.0%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.1%

Utilities

1.7%

-

Technology

VIOG
19.7%
FSGS
18.8%

Industrials

VIOG
19.5%
FSGS
22.0%

Healthcare

VIOG
14.6%
FSGS
16.7%

Financial Services

VIOG
13.7%
FSGS
19.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOG
10.9%
FSGS
8.0%

Real Estate

VIOG
6.6%
FSGS
0.9%

Energy

VIOG
4.1%
FSGS
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

VIOG
3.3%
FSGS
5.0%

Basic Materials

VIOG
3.1%
FSGS
1.7%

Communication Services

VIOG
2.7%
FSGS
3.1%

Utilities

VIOG
1.7%
FSGS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOG vs. FSGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FSGS
FSGS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGS Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOG vs. FSGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIOGFSGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

0.43

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

1.21

+8.79

VIOG vs. FSGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the FSGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOG and FSGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIOGFSGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

0.32

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.11

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.30

+0.29

Drawdowns

VIOG vs. FSGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FSGS drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and FSGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOGFSGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-43.26%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-11.31%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-24.08%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-24.08%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-4.73%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-8.03%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.97%

-1.33%

Volatility

VIOG vs. FSGS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) at 3.74%. This indicates that VIOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOGFSGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

3.74%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

10.73%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

15.24%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

20.14%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

22.81%

+0.03%

VIOG vs. FSGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FSGS's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIOG vs. FSGS - Dividend Comparison

VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while FSGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSGS
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
0.00%0.00%2.71%2.29%1.95%1.35%1.32%1.77%2.13%1.15%0.00%0.00%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.84%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIOG and FSGS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIOG has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to FSGS (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs FSGS's -43.26%.

On 5-year performance, VIOG leads with 5.47% vs 2.19% for FSGS. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FSGS has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VIOG has performed better with a 5.47% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FSGS.

VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for FSGS.

VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while FSGS tracks SMID Growth Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VIOG and 0.60% for FSGS.

VIOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOG and FSGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer