PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 3.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 13.07%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.


VIG

1D
-1.37%
1M
1.51%
YTD
6.56%
6M
6.11%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
13.07%

VONG

1D
-3.25%
1M
0.25%
YTD
3.90%
6M
2.81%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
23.65%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
6.56%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
3.90%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and VONG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.82

The correlation between VIG and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VIG vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
VONG

Technology

26.2%
51.4%

Financial Services

20.6%
5.3%

Healthcare

16.5%
7.1%

Industrials

11.8%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
13.2%

Energy

3.5%
0.4%

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.3%

Utilities

3.2%
0.3%

Communication Services

0.5%
13.2%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Technology

VIG
26.2%
VONG
51.4%

Financial Services

VIG
20.6%
VONG
5.3%

Healthcare

VIG
16.5%
VONG
7.1%

Industrials

VIG
11.8%
VONG
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
10.1%
VONG
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.7%
VONG
13.2%

Energy

VIG
3.5%
VONG
0.4%

Basic Materials

VIG
3.5%
VONG
0.3%

Utilities

VIG
3.2%
VONG
0.3%

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
VONG
13.2%

Real Estate

VIG

-

VONG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIGVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.38

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

4.61

+5.12

VIG vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIGVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.42

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.69

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.87

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.89

-0.29

Drawdowns

VIG vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-32.72%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-16.23%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-23.27%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-32.72%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-32.72%

+1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-4.66%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-4.88%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

4.84%

-2.88%

Volatility

VIG vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.57%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

4.78%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

12.08%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

15.72%

-5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.24%

21.37%

-7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

20.89%

-4.84%

VIG vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIG vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than VONG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.48%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.44%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIG and VONG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONG has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to VIG (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.20% vs 13.07% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.

VIG is categorized as Dividend, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.06% for VONG.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer