VIG vs. SMH
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 13.07%/yr vs 36.02%/yr for SMH. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VIG vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 58.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 13.07%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.02% annualized return.
VIG
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 6.56%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- 1Y
- 18.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
SMH
- 1D
- -9.22%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 58.19%
- 6M
- 56.81%
- 1Y
- 127.40%
- 3Y*
- 58.39%
- 5Y*
- 36.10%
- 10Y*
- 36.02%
VIG vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 6.56% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 58.19% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIG and SMH is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.67 |
The correlation between VIG and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VIG vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIG
SMH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
VIG
SMH
Financial Services
VIG
SMH
-
Healthcare
VIG
SMH
-
Industrials
VIG
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
VIG
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VIG
SMH
-
Energy
VIG
SMH
-
Basic Materials
VIG
SMH
-
Utilities
VIG
SMH
-
Communication Services
VIG
SMH
-
Real Estate
VIG
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIG vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VIG
SMH
VIG vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.59 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 8.58 | -6.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 32.42 | -22.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 4.00 | -2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.03 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 1.11 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.32 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
VIG vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -84.96% | +38.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -14.93% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -35.74% | +20.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -45.30% | +24.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.72% | -45.30% | +13.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -10.69% | +9.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -41.08% | +35.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.94% | -1.98% |
Volatility
VIG vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.57%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.88%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 14.88% | -12.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 26.35% | -18.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.10% | 32.03% | -21.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 35.24% | -21.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 32.70% | -16.65% |
VIG vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIG vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than SMH's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.48% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIG and SMH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to VIG (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.02% vs 13.07% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.02% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.19% for SMH.
VIG is categorized as Dividend, while SMH is Semiconductors. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIG and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer