VIG vs. RLY
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while RLY is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by State Street. VIG is passively managed, while RLY is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 13.24%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for RLY. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.
Performance
VIG vs. RLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has outperformed RLY with an annualized return of 13.24%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.43% annualized return.
VIG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 18.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
RLY
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- 15.03%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
VIG vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.68% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 15.03% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 7.86% | 22.85% | -0.59% | 15.63% | -11.72% | 10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIG and RLY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012 | 0.61 |
The correlation between VIG and RLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VIG vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIG
RLY
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VIG
RLY
-
Financial Services
VIG
RLY
Healthcare
VIG
RLY
Industrials
VIG
RLY
Consumer Defensive
VIG
RLY
Consumer Cyclical
VIG
RLY
Energy
VIG
RLY
Basic Materials
VIG
RLY
Utilities
VIG
RLY
Communication Services
VIG
RLY
-
Real Estate
VIG
-
RLY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIG vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank
VIG
RLY
VIG vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIG | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.49 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 5.95 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.34 | 22.94 | -13.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIG vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than RLY's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and RLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIG | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -37.75% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -4.63% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -10.08% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -18.94% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.72% | -34.17% | +2.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -3.37% | +3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -9.44% | +3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.20% | +0.76% |
Volatility
VIG vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.93%, while SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIG | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 3.25% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 8.47% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.19% | 10.37% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 13.57% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 13.82% | +2.24% |
VIG vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIG vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison
VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than RLY's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 2.92% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIG and RLY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLY has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to VIG (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs RLY's -37.75%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.24% vs 8.43% for RLY. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.
RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
VIG is categorized as Dividend, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.50% for RLY.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIG and RLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer