PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. QQQJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. QQQJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than QQQJ's 20.10% return.


VIG

1D
1.20%
1M
2.49%
YTD
7.11%
6M
5.30%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
13.19%

QQQJ

1D
3.34%
1M
6.28%
YTD
20.10%
6M
17.29%
1Y
42.23%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. QQQJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.11%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%5.43%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
20.10%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and QQQJ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.74

The correlation between VIG and QQQJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIG vs. QQQJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
QQQJ

Technology

26.2%
39.3%

Financial Services

20.6%
1.0%

Healthcare

16.5%
18.3%

Industrials

11.8%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
11.4%

Energy

3.5%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.7%

Utilities

3.2%
2.6%

Communication Services

0.5%
6.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

VIG
26.2%
QQQJ
39.3%

Financial Services

VIG
20.6%
QQQJ
1.0%

Healthcare

VIG
16.5%
QQQJ
18.3%

Industrials

VIG
11.8%
QQQJ
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
10.1%
QQQJ
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.7%
QQQJ
11.4%

Energy

VIG
3.5%
QQQJ
2.6%

Basic Materials

VIG
3.5%
QQQJ
2.7%

Utilities

VIG
3.2%
QQQJ
2.6%

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
QQQJ
6.8%

Real Estate

VIG

-

QQQJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. QQQJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. QQQJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIGQQQJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

3.58

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

15.04

-5.65

VIG vs. QQQJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the QQQJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and QQQJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIG vs. QQQJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than QQQJ's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and QQQJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGQQQJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-39.57%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-11.84%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-22.46%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-39.57%

+19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-3.20%

+2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-15.68%

+10.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.81%

-0.85%

Volatility

VIG vs. QQQJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.90%, while Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGQQQJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

7.69%

-4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

15.73%

-7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

18.97%

-8.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

22.16%

-7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

22.14%

-6.08%

VIG vs. QQQJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQJ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIG vs. QQQJ - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than QQQJ's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.73%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIG and QQQJ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQJ has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to VIG (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs QQQJ's -39.57%.

On 5-year performance, VIG leads with 10.63% vs 6.63% for QQQJ. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VIG has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQJ.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.73% for QQQJ.

VIG is categorized as Dividend, while QQQJ is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.15% for QQQJ.

QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and QQQJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer