VIASP vs. KEN
VIASP (Via Renewables, Inc.) and KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Utilities - Regulated Electric industry within the Utilities sector. Over the past 3 years, VIASP returned 40.39%/yr vs 55.93%/yr for KEN. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VIASP vs. KEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VIASP having a 4.33% return and KEN slightly higher at 4.42%.
VIASP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 13.25%
- 3Y*
- 40.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEN
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -22.75%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 84.50%
- 3Y*
- 55.93%
- 5Y*
- 30.35%
- 10Y*
- 39.45%
VIASP vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIASP Via Renewables, Inc. | 4.33% | 22.82% | 26.04% | 8.25% | -1.13% | 3.38% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 4.42% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 54.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIASP and KEN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2021 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
VIASP:
$187.03M
KEN:
$3.51B
VIASP:
$2.59
KEN:
$1.54
VIASP:
9.86
KEN:
42.93
VIASP:
0.04
KEN:
7.21
VIASP:
0.25
KEN:
3.47
VIASP:
12.16
KEN:
2.34
VIASP:
$480.22M
KEN:
$1.01B
VIASP:
$121.19M
KEN:
$166.82M
VIASP:
$64.60M
KEN:
$339.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIASP vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank
VIASP
KEN
VIASP vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Via Renewables, Inc. (VIASP) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIASP | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 2.77 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.86 | 10.79 | +7.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIASP vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIASP drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, smaller than the maximum KEN drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIASP and KEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIASP | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.50% | -69.20% | +11.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -30.69% | +27.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | -32.27% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -30.69% | +29.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.71% | -23.20% | +16.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 7.86% | -7.12% |
Volatility
VIASP vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Via Renewables, Inc. (VIASP) is 1.34%, while Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a volatility of 15.30%. This indicates that VIASP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIASP | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 15.30% | -13.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.40% | 31.64% | -27.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.96% | 40.07% | -33.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.02% | 39.96% | -7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.02% | 41.91% | -9.89% |
Dividends
VIASP vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison
VIASP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.59%, more than KEN's 5.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.81% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
VIASP Via Renewables, Inc. | 11.59% | 10.88% | 13.00% | 14.21% | 9.87% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VIASP vs. KEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Via Renewables, Inc. and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VIASP vs. KEN - Profitability Comparison
VIASP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Via Renewables, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.41M and revenue of 159.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
VIASP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Via Renewables, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.82M and revenue of 159.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
VIASP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Via Renewables, Inc. reported a net income of 1.71M and revenue of 159.03M, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VIASP and KEN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEN has higher volatility (15.30%) compared to VIASP (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIASP dropped -57.50% vs KEN's -69.20%.
KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIASP and KEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer