PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIASP vs. KEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VIASP vs. KEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Via Renewables, Inc. (VIASP) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VIASP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

KEN

1D
1.05%
1M
-1.07%
6M
-0.40%
YTD
6.24%
1Y
50.59%
3Y*
54.12%
5Y*
31.24%
10Y*
38.18%
ALL TIME*
29.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.44M$1.46M$2.07M

VIASP vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VIASP
Via Renewables, Inc.
7.41%22.82%26.04%8.25%-1.13%3.38%
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
6.24%126.18%62.44%-19.16%-23.73%54.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VIASP and KEN is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2021

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VIASP:

$97.16M

KEN:

$3.51B

EPS

VIASP:

$2.44

KEN:

$1.52

PE Ratio

VIASP:

10.51

KEN:

44.42

PEG Ratio

VIASP:

0.04

KEN:

7.46

PS Ratio

VIASP:

0.26

KEN:

3.59

PB Ratio

VIASP:

12.19

KEN:

2.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

VIASP:

$480.22M

KEN:

$1.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VIASP:

$121.19M

KEN:

$166.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

VIASP:

$64.60M

KEN:

$339.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIASP vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VIASP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


KEN
KEN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
KEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEN Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
KEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEN Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VIASP vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Via Renewables, Inc. (VIASP) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIASPKENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

VIASP vs. KEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIASP vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIASPKENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.14%

Volatility

VIASP vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIASPKENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.92%

Dividends

VIASP vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison

VIASP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
5.71%7.24%11.18%11.46%25.00%7.35%7.41%5.75%96.34%0.00%0.00%45.52%
VIASP
Via Renewables, Inc.
11.41%10.88%13.00%14.21%9.87%4.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VIASP vs. KEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Via Renewables, Inc. and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

VIASP vs. KEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Via Renewables, Inc. and Kenon Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

VIASP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Via Renewables, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.41M and revenue of 159.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.6%.

KEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.

VIASP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Via Renewables, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.82M and revenue of 159.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

KEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

VIASP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Via Renewables, Inc. reported a net income of 1.71M and revenue of 159.03M, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.

KEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VIASP and KEN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIASP and KEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer