KEN vs. CEG
KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) and CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) are both stocks. Both are in the Utilities sector — KEN in Utilities - Regulated Electric, CEG in Utilities - Renewable. Over the past 3 years, KEN returned 54.12%/yr vs 40.69%/yr for CEG. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KEN vs. CEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly higher than CEG's -25.41% return.
KEN
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 50.59%
- 3Y*
- 54.12%
- 5Y*
- 31.24%
- 10Y*
- 38.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 29.41%
CEG
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 9.82%
- 6M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -25.41%
- 1Y
- -22.49%
- 3Y*
- 40.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $725.89M | $725.77M | $982.35M | |
| $1.44M | $1.46M | $2.07M |
KEN vs. CEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 6.24% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -33.55% |
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -25.41% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 73.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEN and CEG is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
KEN:
$3.51B
CEG:
$94.35B
KEN:
$1.52
CEG:
$8.04
KEN:
44.42
CEG:
32.66
KEN:
7.46
CEG:
0.57
KEN:
3.59
CEG:
3.47
KEN:
2.38
CEG:
2.78
KEN:
$1.01B
CEG:
$24.82B
KEN:
$166.82M
CEG:
$20.98B
KEN:
$339.95M
CEG:
$5.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEN vs. CEG — Risk / Return Rank
KEN
CEG
KEN vs. CEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEN | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.94 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | -0.59 | +2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | -1.04 | +5.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEN vs. CEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, which is greater than CEG's maximum drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and CEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEN | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -50.70% | -18.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.19% | -41.22% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.19% | -50.70% | +17.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.49% | -34.69% | +5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.26% | -12.37% | -10.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.14% | 23.25% | -11.11% |
Volatility
KEN vs. CEG - Volatility Comparison
Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) at 9.71%. This indicates that KEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEN | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 9.71% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.11% | 34.35% | -2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.31% | 46.84% | -6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.88% | 49.04% | -9.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.92% | 49.04% | -7.12% |
Dividends
KEN vs. CEG - Dividend Comparison
KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than CEG's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.62% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.71% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
Financials
KEN vs. CEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Constellation Energy Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KEN vs. CEG - Profitability Comparison
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
CEG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 6.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
CEG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported an operating income of 598.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
CEG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KEN and CEG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to CEG (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEN dropped -69.20% vs CEG's -50.70%.
KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEN and CEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer