PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEN vs. CIVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KEN vs. CIVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KEN

1D
-3.46%
1M
-22.75%
YTD
4.42%
6M
6.97%
1Y
84.50%
3Y*
55.93%
5Y*
30.35%
10Y*
39.45%

CIVI

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEN vs. CIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
4.42%126.18%62.44%-19.16%-23.73%93.65%57.17%50.73%23.06%85.88%
CIVI
Civitas Resources, Inc.
1.07%-37.07%-27.22%31.55%31.00%159.28%-17.18%12.92%-25.08%-75.76%

Correlation

The correlation between KEN and CIVI is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2015

0.10

The correlation between KEN and CIVI shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KEN:

$3.51B

CIVI:

$2.44B

EPS

KEN:

$1.54

CIVI:

$7.03

PE Ratio

KEN:

42.93

CIVI:

3.90

PEG Ratio

KEN:

7.21

CIVI:

0.10

PS Ratio

KEN:

3.47

CIVI:

0.53

PB Ratio

KEN:

2.34

CIVI:

0.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

KEN:

$1.01B

CIVI:

$4.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KEN:

$166.82M

CIVI:

$2.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

KEN:

$339.95M

CIVI:

$3.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEN vs. CIVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEN
KEN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
KEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEN Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
KEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEN Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CIVI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEN vs. CIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KENCIVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

KEN vs. CIVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KEN vs. CIVI - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KENCIVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.86%

Volatility

KEN vs. CIVI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KENCIVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.91%

Dividends

KEN vs. CIVI - Dividend Comparison

KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, while CIVI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIVI
Civitas Resources, Inc.
3.65%7.38%10.83%11.11%10.85%2.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
5.81%7.24%11.18%11.46%25.00%7.35%7.41%5.75%96.34%0.00%0.00%45.52%

Financials

KEN vs. CIVI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Civitas Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
317.00M
1.17B
(KEN) Total Revenue
(CIVI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KEN vs. CIVI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Civitas Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
14.8%
70.9%
Portfolio components
KEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.

CIVI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Civitas Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 828.00M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

KEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

CIVI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Civitas Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 778.00M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 66.6%.

KEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.

CIVI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Civitas Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 177.00M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KEN and CIVI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEN and CIVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer