KEN vs. BEP
Compare and contrast key facts about Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP).
Performance
KEN vs. BEP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KEN vs. BEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 24.20% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 93.65% | 57.17% | 50.73% | 23.06% | 85.88% |
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 22.51% | 25.65% | -8.23% | 9.02% | -26.48% | -13.69% | 80.30% | 90.75% | -20.95% | 24.51% |
Fundamentals
KEN:
$4.58B
BEP:
$9.37B
KEN:
$9.03
BEP:
$0.74
KEN:
9.12
BEP:
43.96
KEN:
0.28
BEP:
0.32
KEN:
5.41
BEP:
1.45
KEN:
3.06
BEP:
2.36
KEN:
$803.30M
BEP:
$6.43B
KEN:
$145.79M
BEP:
$2.88B
KEN:
$162.42M
BEP:
$5.03B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 24.20% return, which is significantly higher than BEP's 22.51% return. Over the past 10 years, KEN has outperformed BEP with an annualized return of 45.84%, while BEP has yielded a comparatively lower 13.03% annualized return.
KEN
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 24.20%
- 6M
- 82.33%
- 1Y
- 198.70%
- 3Y*
- 60.58%
- 5Y*
- 39.32%
- 10Y*
- 45.84%
BEP
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 22.51%
- 6M
- 29.83%
- 1Y
- 55.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- -0.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEN vs. BEP — Risk / Return Rank
KEN
BEP
KEN vs. BEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEN | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.40 | 1.80 | +3.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.11 | 2.47 | +2.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.32 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.91 | 3.86 | +9.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.70 | 8.80 | +29.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEN | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.40 | 1.80 | +3.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | -0.01 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | 0.44 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.53 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between KEN and BEP is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KEN vs. BEP - Dividend Comparison
KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than BEP's 4.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.83% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 4.63% | 5.53% | 6.23% | 5.14% | 5.05% | 4.42% | 2.68% | 4.42% | 7.57% | 5.36% | 5.99% | 6.34% |
Drawdowns
KEN vs. BEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, which is greater than BEP's maximum drawdown of -53.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and BEP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEN | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -53.85% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.63% | -14.25% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.20% | -48.29% | -20.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.20% | -53.85% | -15.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -14.58% | +9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.48% | -13.66% | -9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.21% | 6.26% | -1.05% |
Volatility
KEN vs. BEP - Volatility Comparison
Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) at 7.73%. This indicates that KEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KEN | BEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.22% | 7.73% | +3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.24% | 21.02% | +4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.02% | 31.03% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.20% | 30.84% | +8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.16% | 29.77% | +12.39% |
Financials
KEN vs. BEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KEN vs. BEP - Profitability Comparison
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 69.00M and revenue of 265.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.0%.
BEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 110.68M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.1%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 34.00M and revenue of 265.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.
BEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 48.74M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 25.00M and revenue of 265.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
BEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported a net income of 416.30M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.