KEN vs. BEP
Compare and contrast key facts about Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KEN or BEP.
Correlation
The correlation between KEN and BEP is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
KEN vs. BEP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KEN:
1.84
BEP:
-0.05
KEN:
2.56
BEP:
0.21
KEN:
1.32
BEP:
1.02
KEN:
1.08
BEP:
-0.03
KEN:
11.31
BEP:
-0.14
KEN:
5.43%
BEP:
12.51%
KEN:
32.92%
BEP:
36.37%
KEN:
-66.48%
BEP:
-54.26%
KEN:
-29.23%
BEP:
-45.94%
Fundamentals
KEN:
$1.53B
BEP:
$14.48B
KEN:
-$1.44
BEP:
-$0.89
KEN:
0.00
BEP:
3.51
KEN:
$592.00M
BEP:
$4.38B
KEN:
$121.00M
BEP:
$1.49B
KEN:
$332.00M
BEP:
$2.70B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than BEP's -1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, KEN has outperformed BEP with an annualized return of 27.67%, while BEP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.
KEN
-4.61%
1.51%
30.93%
53.44%
29.26%
27.67%
BEP
-1.71%
4.19%
-6.78%
1.78%
-0.93%
9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KEN vs. BEP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KEN
BEP
KEN vs. BEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KEN vs. BEP - Dividend Comparison
KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than BEP's 6.34% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 11.72% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 41.67% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 6.34% | 6.23% | 5.14% | 5.05% | 3.40% | 2.68% | 6.08% | 7.57% | 5.36% | 7.87% | 8.33% | 6.95% |
Drawdowns
KEN vs. BEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -66.48%, which is greater than BEP's maximum drawdown of -54.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and BEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KEN vs. BEP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) is 8.53%, while Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that KEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
KEN vs. BEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities