PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIASP vs. AMZA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIASP vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Via Renewables, Inc. (VIASP) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIASP achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 25.02% return.


VIASP

1D
0.00%
1M
3.12%
6M
7.16%
YTD
7.41%
1Y
13.55%
3Y*
44.97%
5Y*
10Y*

AMZA

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.62%
6M
22.14%
YTD
25.02%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
19.86%
10Y*
4.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIASP vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VIASP
Via Renewables, Inc.
7.41%22.82%26.04%8.25%-1.13%3.38%
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
25.02%0.17%30.90%23.35%33.20%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VIASP and AMZA is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2021

0.10

The correlation between VIASP and AMZA shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIASP vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIASP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AMZA
AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIASP vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Via Renewables, Inc. (VIASP) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIASPAMZADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.19

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

1.65

+3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.12

3.99

+15.14

VIASP vs. AMZA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIASP Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the AMZA Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIASP and AMZA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIASP vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIASP drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIASP and AMZA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIASPAMZADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.50%

-91.46%

+33.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-12.16%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-18.56%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.13%

+8.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-44.71%

+38.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

5.03%

-4.28%

Volatility

VIASP vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Via Renewables, Inc. (VIASP) is 2.66%, while InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that VIASP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIASPAMZADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

6.79%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.97%

13.98%

-9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.26%

18.19%

-10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.94%

25.59%

+6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.94%

37.16%

-5.22%

Dividends

VIASP vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison

VIASP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
8.01%8.81%7.29%9.40%7.65%10.24%22.13%19.47%34.46%24.16%18.36%18.21%
VIASP
Via Renewables, Inc.
11.41%10.88%13.00%14.21%9.87%4.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIASP and AMZA have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZA has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to VIASP (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIASP dropped -57.50% vs AMZA's -91.46%.

VIASP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIASP and AMZA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer