VGT vs. VWO
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.14%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for VWO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
VGT vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 25.14%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.60% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 24.57%
- 6M
- 21.33%
- 1Y
- 50.38%
- 3Y*
- 31.24%
- 5Y*
- 20.82%
- 10Y*
- 25.14%
VWO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
VGT vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.57% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 8.50% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and VWO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005 | 0.67 |
The correlation between VGT and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGT vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
VWO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VGT
VWO
Communication Services
VGT
VWO
Financial Services
VGT
VWO
Industrials
VGT
VWO
Energy
VGT
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
VWO
Basic Materials
VGT
VWO
Healthcare
VGT
VWO
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
VWO
Real Estate
VGT
-
VWO
Utilities
VGT
-
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
VWO
VGT vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGT | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.28 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.18 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 7.79 | +1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGT | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 1.49 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.27 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | 0.45 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.26 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
VGT vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -67.68% | +13.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -11.17% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -17.37% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -32.60% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -36.39% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -4.67% | -2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -15.81% | +7.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 3.12% | +2.05% |
Volatility
VGT vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 6.29%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 6.29% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 13.80% | +3.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 16.37% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 17.45% | +7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 19.23% | +5.46% |
VGT vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGT vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VWO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and VWO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to VWO (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.14% vs 8.60% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.08% for VWO.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer