VGT vs. LMT
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.19%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for LMT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VGT vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 25.19%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
LMT
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
VGT vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 13.04% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and LMT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.34 |
The correlation between VGT and LMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
LMT
VGT vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.14 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 0.73 | +2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 1.69 | +7.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -79.29% | +24.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -25.15% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -31.79% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -31.79% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -36.67% | +1.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -19.63% | +12.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -26.83% | +18.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 10.81% | -5.53% |
Volatility
VGT vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 7.02%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 7.02% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 20.04% | -2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 26.71% | -4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 22.99% | +2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 23.76% | +0.96% |
Dividends
VGT vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than LMT's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.53% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and LMT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to LMT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs LMT's -79.29%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer