PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LMT vs. NOC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LMTNOC
YTD Return3.33%4.03%
1Y Return1.83%6.59%
3Y Return (Ann)9.90%12.84%
5Y Return (Ann)9.85%12.68%
10Y Return (Ann)14.10%16.88%
Sharpe Ratio0.170.33
Daily Std Dev17.20%21.27%
Max Drawdown-70.23%-69.38%
Current Drawdown-4.66%-9.54%

Fundamentals


LMTNOC
Market Cap$110.68B$71.17B
EPS$27.31$14.37
PE Ratio16.8933.43
PEG Ratio4.440.91
Revenue (TTM)$69.64B$40.12B
Gross Profit (TTM)$8.39B$7.47B
EBITDA (TTM)$10.15B$4.14B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between LMT and NOC is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LMT vs. NOC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly lower than NOC's 4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has underperformed NOC with an annualized return of 14.10%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.88% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


16,000.00%18,000.00%20,000.00%22,000.00%24,000.00%26,000.00%28,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
28,498.76%
18,860.56%
LMT
NOC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lockheed Martin Corporation

Northrop Grumman Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LMT vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LMT, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.55
NOC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NOC, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NOC, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NOC, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NOC, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NOC, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.37

LMT vs. NOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the NOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LMT and NOC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.40December2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.17
0.33
LMT
NOC

Dividends

LMT vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than NOC's 1.54% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.65%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%3.22%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.54%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%1.84%2.08%

Drawdowns

LMT vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -70.23%, roughly equal to the maximum NOC drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and NOC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
-4.66%
-9.54%
LMT
NOC

Volatility

LMT vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is 3.79%, while Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that LMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
3.79%
5.53%
LMT
NOC

Financials

LMT vs. NOC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lockheed Martin Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items