PortfoliosLab logo
LMT vs. NOC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and NOC is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LMT vs. NOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LMT:

-0.06

NOC:

-0.08

Sortino Ratio

LMT:

0.06

NOC:

0.05

Omega Ratio

LMT:

1.01

NOC:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

LMT:

-0.06

NOC:

-0.11

Martin Ratio

LMT:

-0.11

NOC:

-0.26

Ulcer Index

LMT:

16.00%

NOC:

8.72%

Daily Std Dev

LMT:

23.19%

NOC:

25.47%

Max Drawdown

LMT:

-70.23%

NOC:

-69.38%

Current Drawdown

LMT:

-25.92%

NOC:

-15.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LMT:

$105.24B

NOC:

$67.74B

EPS

LMT:

$23.22

NOC:

$25.35

PE Ratio

LMT:

19.34

NOC:

18.57

PEG Ratio

LMT:

1.67

NOC:

3.05

PS Ratio

LMT:

1.47

NOC:

1.68

PB Ratio

LMT:

16.12

NOC:

4.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

LMT:

$71.81B

NOC:

$40.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LMT:

$7.35B

NOC:

$7.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

LMT:

$9.08B

NOC:

$5.70B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly lower than NOC's -2.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has underperformed NOC with an annualized return of 11.84%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.04% annualized return.


LMT

YTD

-6.88%

1M

-5.50%

6M

-18.36%

1Y

-1.33%

5Y*

7.39%

10Y*

11.84%

NOC

YTD

-2.33%

1M

-14.84%

6M

-11.56%

1Y

-2.09%

5Y*

9.07%

10Y*

13.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LMT vs. NOC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMT is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMT is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMT is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMT is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMT is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMT is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NOC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOC is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOC is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOC is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOC is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOC is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOC is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LMT vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the NOC Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and NOC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LMT vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than NOC's 1.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.87%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.81%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%1.84%

Drawdowns

LMT vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -70.23%, roughly equal to the maximum NOC drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and NOC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LMT vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is 6.03%, while Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) has a volatility of 14.90%. This indicates that LMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LMT vs. NOC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lockheed Martin Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00B20212022202320242025
17.96B
9.47B
(LMT) Total Revenue
(NOC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LMT vs. NOC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lockheed Martin Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
12.9%
16.7%
(LMT) Gross Margin
(NOC) Gross Margin
LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 17.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

NOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.58B and revenue of 9.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 17.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.

NOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 573.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 17.96B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

NOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 481.00M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.