PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LMT vs. NOC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and NOC is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

LMT vs. NOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-19.65%
-11.33%
LMT
NOC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LMT:

0.33

NOC:

0.02

Sortino Ratio

LMT:

0.56

NOC:

0.16

Omega Ratio

LMT:

1.09

NOC:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

LMT:

0.21

NOC:

0.02

Martin Ratio

LMT:

0.59

NOC:

0.04

Ulcer Index

LMT:

11.09%

NOC:

7.86%

Daily Std Dev

LMT:

19.91%

NOC:

18.92%

Max Drawdown

LMT:

-70.23%

NOC:

-69.38%

Current Drawdown

LMT:

-27.84%

NOC:

-17.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LMT:

$103.74B

NOC:

$64.84B

EPS

LMT:

$22.29

NOC:

$28.36

PE Ratio

LMT:

19.77

NOC:

15.80

PEG Ratio

LMT:

1.63

NOC:

2.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

LMT:

$71.04B

NOC:

$41.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LMT:

$7.02B

NOC:

$8.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

LMT:

$8.82B

NOC:

$6.17B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a -9.31% return, which is significantly lower than NOC's -4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has underperformed NOC with an annualized return of 10.83%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.


LMT

YTD

-9.31%

1M

-11.74%

6M

-19.65%

1Y

5.45%

5Y*

3.33%

10Y*

10.83%

NOC

YTD

-4.55%

1M

-10.84%

6M

-11.33%

1Y

-0.34%

5Y*

5.84%

10Y*

11.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LMT vs. NOC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMT is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMT is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMT is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMT is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMT is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMT is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NOC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOC is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOC is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOC is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOC is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOC is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOC is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LMT vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.330.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.560.16
The chart of Omega ratio for LMT, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.091.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.210.02
The chart of Martin ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.590.04
LMT
NOC

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the NOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and NOC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.33
0.02
LMT
NOC

Dividends

LMT vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than NOC's 1.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.89%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
1.80%1.72%1.57%1.24%1.59%1.86%1.50%1.92%1.27%1.50%1.64%1.84%

Drawdowns

LMT vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -70.23%, roughly equal to the maximum NOC drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and NOC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-27.84%
-17.29%
LMT
NOC

Volatility

LMT vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) at 7.44%. This indicates that LMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.84%
7.44%
LMT
NOC

Financials

LMT vs. NOC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lockheed Martin Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab