LMT vs. XAR

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a -4.67% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 10.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has underperformed XAR with an annualized return of 12.11%, while XAR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.06% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the XAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and XAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than XAR's 0.62% yield.

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -70.23%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and XAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) have volatilities of 5.63% and 5.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.