PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LMT vs. XAR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LMT and XAR is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

LMT vs. XAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%1,100.00%1,200.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
911.57%
701.83%
LMT
XAR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LMT:

0.59

XAR:

2.04

Sortino Ratio

LMT:

0.91

XAR:

2.72

Omega Ratio

LMT:

1.13

XAR:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

LMT:

0.43

XAR:

4.54

Martin Ratio

LMT:

1.22

XAR:

12.80

Ulcer Index

LMT:

8.40%

XAR:

2.84%

Daily Std Dev

LMT:

17.45%

XAR:

17.86%

Max Drawdown

LMT:

-70.23%

XAR:

-46.37%

Current Drawdown

LMT:

-19.72%

XAR:

-1.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMT achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LMT has underperformed XAR with an annualized return of 12.62%, while XAR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.57% annualized return.


LMT

YTD

0.90%

1M

1.53%

6M

4.47%

1Y

9.49%

5Y*

5.67%

10Y*

12.62%

XAR

YTD

4.12%

1M

6.71%

6M

20.76%

1Y

34.69%

5Y*

9.01%

10Y*

13.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LMT vs. XAR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMT is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMT is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMT is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMT is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMT is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMT is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

XAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XAR is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XAR is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XAR is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XAR is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XAR is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XAR is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LMT vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.592.04
The chart of Sortino ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.912.72
The chart of Omega ratio for LMT, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for LMT, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.434.54
The chart of Martin ratio for LMT, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.2212.80
LMT
XAR

The current LMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the XAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMT and XAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.59
2.04
LMT
XAR

Dividends

LMT vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison

LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than XAR's 0.64% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.60%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.64%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.10%2.31%1.07%

Drawdowns

LMT vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMT drawdown since its inception was -70.23%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMT and XAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-19.72%
-1.86%
LMT
XAR

Volatility

LMT vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is 5.89%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that LMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.89%
6.89%
LMT
XAR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab