PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than FSMDX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 24.81%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.66% annualized return.


VGT

1D
-6.14%
1M
2.53%
YTD
22.48%
6M
20.33%
1Y
47.86%
3Y*
30.47%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
24.81%

FSMDX

1D
0.53%
1M
3.11%
YTD
13.05%
6M
12.39%
1Y
21.80%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.48%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
13.05%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and FSMDX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.78

The correlation between VGT and FSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGTFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.80

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.59

10.78

-1.19

VGT vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGTFSMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.70

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.46

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.61

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.70

-0.04

Drawdowns

VGT vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-40.35%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-8.16%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-20.92%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-26.07%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-40.35%

+5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

0.00%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-4.95%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

2.11%

+3.04%

Volatility

VGT vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 3.21%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

3.21%

+6.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

9.91%

+7.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

13.40%

+8.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

18.26%

+7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.68%

19.31%

+5.37%

VGT vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGT vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than FSMDX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.97%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to FSMDX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer