PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMDX vs. FLAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMDX vs. FLAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMDX achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly lower than FLAPX's 17.01% return.


FSMDX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.33%
6M
11.53%
YTD
14.95%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
12.64%

FLAPX

1D
0.72%
1M
-0.83%
6M
12.35%
YTD
17.01%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSMDX vs. FLAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
14.95%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%13.30%
FLAPX
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund
17.01%14.33%15.30%17.28%-17.28%22.59%17.30%30.56%-9.10%14.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FSMDX and FLAPX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FSMDX and FLAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMDX vs. FLAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FLAPX
FLAPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FLAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSMDX vs. FLAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMDXFLAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.68

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

10.55

-1.85

FSMDX vs. FLAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the FLAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMDX and FLAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSMDX vs. FLAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, roughly equal to the maximum FLAPX drawdown of -40.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMDX and FLAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMDXFLAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-40.31%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-9.21%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.92%

-21.02%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.07%

-26.09%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.22%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-6.03%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.35%

-0.24%

Volatility

FSMDX vs. FLAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) is 2.42%, while Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund (FLAPX) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that FSMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMDXFLAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

3.24%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

11.80%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

15.92%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

18.62%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

19.86%

-0.59%

FSMDX vs. FLAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAPX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSMDX vs. FLAPX - Dividend Comparison

FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while FLAPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAPX
Fidelity Flex Mid Cap Index Fund
0.00%0.00%1.08%1.99%1.82%2.83%2.16%2.18%2.24%0.44%0.00%0.00%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.76%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FSMDX and FLAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLAPX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to FSMDX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMDX dropped -40.35% vs FLAPX's -40.31%.

FLAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMDX and FLAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer