FSMDX vs. FLPSX
FSMDX (Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund) and FLPSX (Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund) are both mutual funds - FSMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while FLPSX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FSMDX is passively managed, while FLPSX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSMDX returned 12.12%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for FLPSX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSMDX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FLPSX.
Performance
FSMDX vs. FLPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMDX achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly higher than FLPSX's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FSMDX has outperformed FLPSX with an annualized return of 12.12%, while FLPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.42% annualized return.
FSMDX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 22.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
FLPSX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 21.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
FSMDX vs. FLPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | 14.03% | 10.58% | 15.55% | 17.20% | -17.27% | 22.56% | 17.13% | 30.53% | -9.38% | 18.04% |
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | 10.70% | 14.69% | 7.23% | 14.41% | -5.69% | 24.46% | 9.34% | 25.75% | -10.80% | 18.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMDX and FLPSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FSMDX and FLPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMDX vs. FLPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FSMDX
FLPSX
FSMDX vs. FLPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSMDX | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.51 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 8.54 | +2.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSMDX vs. FLPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMDX drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, smaller than the maximum FLPSX drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMDX and FLPSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMDX | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.35% | -54.81% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.16% | -8.87% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.92% | -17.66% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.07% | -18.76% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.35% | -38.16% | -2.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -1.11% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -5.65% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.60% | -0.47% |
Volatility
FSMDX vs. FLPSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) at 3.44%. This indicates that FSMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMDX | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 3.44% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 9.15% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 12.77% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 17.20% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 17.37% | +1.98% |
FSMDX vs. FLPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSMDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FLPSX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSMDX vs. FLPSX - Dividend Comparison
FSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than FLPSX's 12.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | 12.00% | 13.28% | 16.24% | 18.29% | 9.45% | 12.11% | 11.14% | 8.14% | 13.45% | 7.45% | 4.85% | 4.04% |
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | 0.97% | 1.10% | 2.46% | 1.39% | 2.07% | 3.35% | 2.34% | 2.86% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.23% | 2.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FSMDX and FLPSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FSMDX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to FLPSX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMDX dropped -40.35% vs FLPSX's -54.81%.
FLPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMDX and FLPSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer