PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. DDWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. DDWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than DDWM's 7.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed DDWM with an annualized return of 25.19%, while DDWM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.95% annualized return.


VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
1.35%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%

DDWM

1D
0.43%
1M
0.58%
YTD
7.47%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. DDWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
7.47%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and DDWM is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.61

The correlation between VGT and DDWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGT vs. DDWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
DDWM

Technology

98.5%
9.0%

Communication Services

0.5%
5.4%

Financial Services

0.5%
20.7%

Industrials

0.4%
21.1%

Energy

0.3%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
10.6%

Basic Materials

0.0%
5.5%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.4%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Technology

VGT
98.5%
DDWM
9.0%

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
DDWM
5.4%

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
DDWM
20.7%

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
DDWM
21.1%

Energy

VGT
0.3%
DDWM
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
DDWM
10.6%

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
DDWM
5.5%

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
DDWM
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

DDWM
7.4%

Real Estate

VGT

-

DDWM
3.0%

Utilities

VGT

-

DDWM
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. DDWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. DDWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGTDDWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.87

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.11

6.73

+2.38

VGT vs. DDWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the DDWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and DDWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGT vs. DDWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than DDWM's maximum drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and DDWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTDDWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-35.00%

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-10.56%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-12.34%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-14.79%

-20.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-35.00%

-0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-1.94%

-5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-4.05%

-3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

2.93%

+2.35%

Volatility

VGT vs. DDWM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) at 4.34%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTDDWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

4.34%

+5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.00%

10.94%

+7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.00%

13.03%

+8.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.40%

13.40%

+12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

15.31%

+9.41%

VGT vs. DDWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DDWM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGT vs. DDWM - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than DDWM's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.31%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and DDWM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to DDWM (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs DDWM's -35.00%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 10.95% for DDWM. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while DDWM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.40% for DDWM.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and DDWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer