PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. IVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than IVLU's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has underperformed IVLU with an annualized return of 10.94%, while IVLU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.


DDWM

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
6.75%
6M
6.95%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
10.94%

IVLU

1D
-1.89%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
11.28%
6M
10.90%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
23.64%
5Y*
14.30%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.75%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
11.28%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and IVLU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.89

The correlation between DDWM and IVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. IVLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
IVLU

Industrials

21.1%
18.8%

Financial Services

20.7%
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
7.6%

Technology

9.0%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
6.0%

Basic Materials

5.5%
7.4%

Communication Services

5.4%
3.7%

Utilities

5.2%
3.6%

Energy

3.7%
5.5%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.4%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
IVLU
18.8%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.7%
IVLU
26.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.6%
IVLU
7.6%

Technology

DDWM
9.0%
IVLU
10.6%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.6%
IVLU
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.4%
IVLU
6.0%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.5%
IVLU
7.4%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.4%
IVLU
3.7%

Utilities

DDWM
5.2%
IVLU
3.6%

Energy

DDWM
3.7%
IVLU
5.5%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.0%
IVLU
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDWMIVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

2.96

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

11.24

-4.19

DDWM vs. IVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the IVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and IVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum IVLU drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and IVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMIVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-41.85%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-11.69%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-15.48%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-26.04%

+11.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-41.85%

+6.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-2.23%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-8.56%

+4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.08%

-0.15%

Volatility

DDWM vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 4.18%, while iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMIVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

5.27%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

12.94%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

15.65%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

16.54%

-3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

17.44%

-2.30%

DDWM vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IVLU's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than IVLU's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.32%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
3.38%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DDWM and IVLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVLU has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DDWM (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs IVLU's -41.85%.

On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.56% vs 10.94% for DDWM. On fees, IVLU is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVLU is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 2.32% for DDWM.

DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and IVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer