PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VGRO vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VGRO vs. ILCB

Last updated Jul 30, 2026
Documentation

VGRO (Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. VGRO is actively managed, while ILCB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VGRO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.

Performance

VGRO vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF (VGRO) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGRO achieves a -3.29% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 7.53% return.

VGRO

1D
-1.60%
1M
-4.62%
6M
-2.34%
YTD
-3.29%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

ILCB

1D
-1.54%
1M
-1.75%
6M
5.43%
YTD
7.53%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
14.06%
ALL TIME*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

ILCB

iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
$834.32K$1.53M$1.33M

VGRO

Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF
$13.12K$11.58K$24.68K

VGRO vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
VGRO
Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF		-3.29%-0.88%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF		7.53%-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VGRO and ILCB is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.91

VGRO vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VGRO
ILCB

Technology

48.7%
38.4%

Communication Services

20.1%
9.8%

Industrials

9.5%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.4%

Healthcare

7.3%
9.0%

Utilities

4.7%
2.2%

Financial Services

4.2%
11.4%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Energy

-

3.1%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Technology

VGRO
48.7%
ILCB
38.4%

Communication Services

VGRO
20.1%
ILCB
9.8%

Industrials

VGRO
9.5%
ILCB
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VGRO
7.8%
ILCB
9.4%

Healthcare

VGRO
7.3%
ILCB
9.0%

Utilities

VGRO
4.7%
ILCB
2.2%

Financial Services

VGRO
4.2%
ILCB
11.4%

Basic Materials

VGRO
1.5%
ILCB
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

VGRO

-

ILCB
4.4%

Energy

VGRO

-

ILCB
3.1%

Real Estate

VGRO

-

ILCB
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF

iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF

Often compared with VGRO:
VGRO vs. SCHGVGRO vs. DGROVGRO vs. VUGVGRO vs. DARPVGRO vs. PBUSVGRO vs. LRNZVGRO vs. ASGM
Often compared with ILCB:
ILCB vs. ILCGILCB vs. VOOILCB vs. IVVILCB vs. SPYILCB vs. SCHBILCB vs. VTIILCB vs. BBUS

Return for Risk

VGRO vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
VGRO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGRO vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF (VGRO) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VGROILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.23

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

1.75

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.22

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

1.75

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

7.40

—

VGRO vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGRO vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGRO drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGRO and ILCB.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VGROILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-51.53%

+36.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-9.09%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-19.05%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-25.47%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.30%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-3.88%

-6.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-6.21%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

2.15%

—

Volatility

VGRO vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VGROILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

3.19%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

10.08%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

12.90%

+6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.46%

17.23%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

18.18%

+1.28%

VGRO vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGRO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGRO vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

VGRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF		1.01%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
VGRO
Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, VGRO and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VGRO.

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for VGRO.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VGRO and 0.03% for ILCB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGRO and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer