VGRO vs. ILCB
VGRO (Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. VGRO is actively managed, while ILCB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGRO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
VGRO vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGRO achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 10.94% return.
VGRO
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
VGRO vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGRO Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF | 2.80% | -0.88% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 10.94% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGRO and ILCB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGRO vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
VGRO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILCB
VGRO vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF (VGRO) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGRO | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGRO vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGRO drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGRO and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGRO | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.49% | -51.53% | +36.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -0.83% | -4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -6.22% | +1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
VGRO vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGRO | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.65% | 12.65% | +7.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.23% | +2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 18.16% | +1.49% |
VGRO vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGRO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGRO vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
VGRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
VGRO Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VGRO and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VGRO.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for VGRO.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VGRO and 0.03% for ILCB.
Find the right allocation for VGRO and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer