VGMS vs. VYM
VGMS (Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGMS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. VGMS is actively managed, while VYM is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGMS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VGMS vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGMS achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return.
VGMS
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VYM
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
VGMS vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 1.06% | 5.44% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.47% | 11.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGMS and VYM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGMS vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VGMS
VYM
VGMS vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGMS | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 0.51 | +1.60 |
Drawdowns
VGMS vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGMS drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGMS and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGMS | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -56.98% | +54.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.43% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -7.19% | +6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.78% | — |
Volatility
VGMS vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGMS | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 10.28% | -7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 13.96% | -10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 16.34% | -13.13% |
VGMS vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGMS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGMS vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VGMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 5.16% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGMS and VYM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGMS.
VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 2.19% for VYM.
VGMS is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while VYM is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGMS and 0.04% for VYM.
Find the right allocation for VGMS and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer