PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGMS vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGMS vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGMS achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.22% return.


VGMS

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.52%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VCIT

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.37%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGMS vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VGMS and VCIT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.86

The correlation between VGMS and VCIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGMS vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGMS
VGMS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VGMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGMS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VGMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGMS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGMS vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGMSVCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.82

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

5.78

+6.38

VGMS vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGMS Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGMS and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGMS vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGMS drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGMS and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGMSVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-20.56%

+18.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-2.96%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-1.32%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-3.15%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.93%

-0.39%

Volatility

VGMS vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) is 1.05%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that VGMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGMSVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.23%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

3.18%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.27%

4.11%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

6.62%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.24%

6.29%

-3.05%

VGMS vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGMS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGMS vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

VGMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than VCIT's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%
VGMS
Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF
5.15%2.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGMS and VCIT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCIT has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to VGMS (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGMS dropped -2.46% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 1-year performance, VGMS leads with 6.59% vs 5.37% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGMS has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGMS has performed better with a 6.59% return vs 5.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGMS.

VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 4.80% for VCIT.

VGMS is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while VCIT is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGMS and 0.03% for VCIT.

VGMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGMS and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer