VGMS vs. VUG
VGMS (Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGMS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. VGMS is actively managed, while VUG is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGMS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
VGMS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGMS achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return.
VGMS
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
VGMS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 1.06% | 5.44% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 15.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGMS and VUG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGMS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
VGMS
VUG
VGMS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGMS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 0.62 | +1.49 |
Drawdowns
VGMS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGMS drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGMS and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGMS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -50.68% | +48.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.51% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -7.09% | +6.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.71% | — |
Volatility
VGMS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGMS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 15.84% | -12.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 22.22% | -19.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 21.44% | -18.23% |
VGMS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGMS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGMS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
VGMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 5.16% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGMS and VUG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGMS.
VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
VGMS is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGMS and 0.03% for VUG.
Find the right allocation for VGMS and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer