PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGIT vs. XLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGIT vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGIT achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, VGIT has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 1.20%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


VGIT

1D
0.51%
1M
0.19%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
0.02%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.20%

XLY

1D
2.48%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-2.41%
6M
-2.84%
1Y
9.18%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGIT vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
-0.17%7.34%1.39%4.28%-10.53%-2.64%7.71%6.19%1.35%1.70%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-2.41%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VGIT and XLY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

-0.18

The correlation between VGIT and XLY shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGIT vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGIT
VGIT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VGIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGIT vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGITXLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.10

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.62

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

1.89

+1.73

VGIT vs. XLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGIT and XLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGIT vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGIT drawdown since its inception was -16.05%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGIT and XLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGITXLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.05%

-59.05%

+43.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-14.98%

+12.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.34%

-26.01%

+21.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

-39.67%

+24.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.05%

-39.67%

+23.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-6.41%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-9.55%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

4.86%

-3.86%

Volatility

VGIT vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is 1.14%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that VGIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGITXLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

6.20%

-5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.41%

13.52%

-11.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

18.29%

-14.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

23.84%

-18.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

22.08%

-17.58%

VGIT vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGIT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGIT vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

VGIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
3.86%3.79%3.67%2.73%1.74%1.69%2.23%2.24%2.05%1.67%1.69%1.69%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGIT and XLY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to VGIT (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGIT dropped -16.05% vs XLY's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.72% vs 1.20% for VGIT. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 1.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLY.

VGIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

VGIT is categorized as Government Bonds, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGIT and 0.13% for XLY.

VGIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGIT and XLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer