PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFVA vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFVA vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.


VFVA

1D
-1.33%
1M
0.94%
YTD
9.50%
6M
10.40%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFVA vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
9.50%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%25.42%-15.61%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VFVA and USL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.30

The correlation between VFVA and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFVA vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFVA
USL

Financial Services

25.7%
4.5%

Healthcare

14.9%

-

Technology

14.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%

-

Industrials

7.6%

-

Energy

7.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.1%

-

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

VFVA
25.7%
USL
4.5%

Healthcare

VFVA
14.9%
USL

-

Technology

VFVA
14.5%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

VFVA
13.1%
USL

-

Industrials

VFVA
7.6%
USL

-

Energy

VFVA
7.3%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

VFVA
7.1%
USL

-

Communication Services

VFVA
6.2%
USL

-

Basic Materials

VFVA
3.3%
USL

-

Real Estate

VFVA
0.4%
USL

-

Utilities

VFVA

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFVA vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFVA vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFVAUSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

2.04

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

2.58

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.47

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.61

7.02

+3.59

VFVA vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFVA Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFVA and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFVAUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.04

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.58

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.01

+0.42

Drawdowns

VFVA vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFVAUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.58%

-89.06%

+40.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-16.76%

+8.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.07%

-23.33%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-33.82%

+9.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-38.16%

+36.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-61.46%

+54.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

8.27%

-5.58%

Volatility

VFVA vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) is 3.36%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that VFVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFVAUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

10.53%

-7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

23.33%

-13.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

28.54%

-13.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

30.08%

-9.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.32%

32.35%

-8.03%

VFVA vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFVA vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.95%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFVA and USL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to VFVA (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFVA dropped -48.58% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.41% vs 9.48% for VFVA. On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFVA has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

VFVA is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFVA and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFVA and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer