PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFVA vs. TMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VFVA vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VFVA vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
2.10%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%3.80%
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
4.14%2.91%2.64%2.25%-5.10%23.45%4.82%3.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than TMDV's 4.14% return.


VFVA

1D
0.20%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
2.10%
6M
6.23%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*

TMDV

1D
0.27%
1M
-6.06%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.03%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VFVA vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VFVA vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFVA vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFVATMDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.35

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

0.61

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.07

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

0.49

+0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.36

1.42

+3.94

VFVA vs. TMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the TMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFVA and TMDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFVATMDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.35

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.26

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.31

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between VFVA and TMDV is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VFVA vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison

VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than TMDV's 2.63% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
2.09%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.63%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%0.00%

Drawdowns

VFVA vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than TMDV's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and TMDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VFVATMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.58%

-33.42%

-15.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.54%

-10.52%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-17.11%

-6.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.24%

-6.91%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-5.42%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

3.65%

+0.26%

Volatility

VFVA vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) at 3.78%. This indicates that VFVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VFVATMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

3.78%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

8.35%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.24%

14.86%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.25%

14.43%

+5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

18.78%

+5.73%