VFQY vs. QDEF
VFQY (Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. VFQY is actively managed, while QDEF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFQY returned 9.15%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for QDEF. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VFQY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDEF.
Performance
VFQY vs. QDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFQY achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly higher than QDEF's 10.91% return.
VFQY
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.62%
QDEF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $574.46K | $566.98K | $752.75K | |
| $948.51K | $988.82K | $1.06M |
VFQY vs. QDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.20% | 10.24% | 12.93% | 22.48% | -15.74% | 27.96% | 16.97% | 25.75% | -8.19% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 10.91% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 26.04% | 3.15% | 24.90% | -3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFQY and QDEF is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VFQY and QDEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
VFQY vs. QDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFQY
QDEF
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VFQY
QDEF
Financial Services
VFQY
QDEF
Industrials
VFQY
QDEF
Consumer Cyclical
VFQY
QDEF
Consumer Defensive
VFQY
QDEF
Healthcare
VFQY
QDEF
Communication Services
VFQY
QDEF
Basic Materials
VFQY
QDEF
Energy
VFQY
QDEF
Real Estate
VFQY
-
QDEF
Utilities
VFQY
-
QDEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFQY vs. QDEF — Risk / Return Rank
VFQY
QDEF
VFQY vs. QDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFQY | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.41 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.10 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 12.91 | -3.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFQY vs. QDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFQY drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, roughly equal to the maximum QDEF drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFQY and QDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFQY | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -35.74% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -6.95% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -14.43% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -21.37% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -3.27% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 1.66% | +0.75% |
Volatility
VFQY vs. QDEF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) at 2.23%. This indicates that VFQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFQY | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.23% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 7.47% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 9.84% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 13.77% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 16.14% | +4.59% |
VFQY vs. QDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFQY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than QDEF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFQY vs. QDEF - Dividend Comparison
VFQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than QDEF's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.57% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.03% | 1.17% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFQY and QDEF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFQY has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to QDEF (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFQY dropped -37.41% vs QDEF's -35.74%.
On 5-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.40% vs 9.15% for VFQY. On fees, VFQY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFQY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.03% for VFQY.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFQY and 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFQY and QDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer