PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFQY vs. VFVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFQY vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFQY achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly lower than VFVA's 19.47% return.


VFQY

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.15%
6M
10.45%
YTD
13.01%
1Y
22.01%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.49%

VFVA

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.08%
6M
14.51%
YTD
19.47%
1Y
37.96%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$877.35K$995.36K$1.05M
$2.76M$2.45M$1.67M

VFQY vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFQY
Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF
13.01%10.24%12.93%22.48%-15.74%27.96%16.97%25.75%-8.19%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
19.47%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%25.42%-18.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VFQY and VFVA is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.90

The correlation between VFQY and VFVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFQY vs. VFVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFQY
VFVA

Technology

25.8%
14.5%

Financial Services

18.9%
25.7%

Industrials

16.8%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
13.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
7.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
14.9%

Communication Services

2.8%
6.2%

Basic Materials

2.2%
3.3%

Energy

2.2%
7.3%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

VFQY
25.8%
VFVA
14.5%

Financial Services

VFQY
18.9%
VFVA
25.7%

Industrials

VFQY
16.8%
VFVA
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VFQY
13.3%
VFVA
13.1%

Consumer Defensive

VFQY
9.2%
VFVA
7.1%

Healthcare

VFQY
8.9%
VFVA
14.9%

Communication Services

VFQY
2.8%
VFVA
6.2%

Basic Materials

VFQY
2.2%
VFVA
3.3%

Energy

VFQY
2.2%
VFVA
7.3%

Real Estate

VFQY

-

VFVA
0.4%

Utilities

VFQY

-

VFVA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFQY vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VFQY
VFQY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VFQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFQY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VFQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VFQY vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFQYVFVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.42

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

4.19

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

14.15

-5.62

VFQY vs. VFVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFQY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the VFVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFQY and VFVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFQY vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFQY drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFQY and VFVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFQYVFVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.41%

-48.58%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-8.55%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.67%

-24.07%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-24.07%

-1.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.29%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-7.24%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.52%

-0.11%

Volatility

VFQY vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) is 2.96%, while Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that VFQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFQYVFVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

4.31%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

10.12%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

14.96%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

20.05%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

24.20%

-3.47%

VFQY vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFQY and VFVA have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFQY vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

VFQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than VFVA's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VFQY
Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.04%1.17%1.34%1.38%1.43%0.98%1.22%1.34%1.31%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.77%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFQY and VFVA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFVA has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to VFQY (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFQY dropped -37.41% vs VFVA's -48.58%.

On 5-year performance, VFVA leads with 12.45% vs 8.92% for VFQY. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, VFQY has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFVA has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFQY and VFVA have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.04% for VFQY.

VFQY is categorized as Quality Factor, while VFVA is Mid Cap Value Equities.

VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFQY and VFVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer