VFQY vs. VFVA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

VFQY (Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFQY is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VFVA is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFQY returned 8.56%/yr vs 9.83%/yr for VFVA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.13% expense ratio.

Performance

VFQY vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFQY achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly lower than VFVA's 10.97% return.

VFQY

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 8.01%
• 6M: 9.05%
• 1Y: 20.74%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 8.56%
• 10Y*: —

VFVA

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 6M: 13.44%
• 1Y: 32.32%
• 3Y*: 17.86%
• 5Y*: 9.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFQY vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF	8.01%	10.24%	12.93%	22.48%	-15.74%	27.96%	16.97%	25.75%	-7.85%
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF	10.97%	14.77%	7.67%	17.37%	-3.96%	36.94%	2.28%	25.42%	-15.61%

Correlation

The correlation between VFQY and VFVA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018	0.90

The correlation between VFQY and VFVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFQY vs. VFVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VFQY	VFVA
Technology	25.8%	14.5%
Financial Services	18.9%	25.7%
Industrials	16.8%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	7.1%
Healthcare	8.9%	14.9%
Communication Services	2.8%	6.2%
Basic Materials	2.2%	3.3%
Energy	2.2%	7.3%
Real Estate	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VFQY vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFQY

VFQY Risk / Return Rank: 45
VFQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
VFQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
VFQY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
VFQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
VFQY Martin Ratio Rank: 49

VFVA

VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 66
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFQY vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VFQY	VFVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	2.12	-0.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.09	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.73	-1.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	11.86	-3.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFQY vs. VFVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFQY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the VFVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFQY and VFVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VFQY	VFVA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	2.12	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.49	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.43	+0.10

Drawdowns

VFQY vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFQY drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFQY and VFVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFQY	VFVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.41%	-48.58%	+11.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.12%	-8.55%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.67%	-24.07%	+3.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.93%	-24.07%	-1.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.19%	+0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-7.31%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	2.69%	-0.23%

Volatility

VFQY vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) is 2.83%, while Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that VFQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFQY	VFVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	3.21%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.47%	9.71%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.51%	15.29%	-1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.33%	20.17%	-1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.87%	24.32%	-3.45%

VFQY vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFQY and VFVA have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VFQY vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

VFQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than VFVA's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF	1.09%	1.17%	1.34%	1.38%	1.43%	0.98%	1.22%	1.34%	1.31%
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF	1.93%	2.13%	2.40%	2.45%	2.21%	1.68%	2.04%	2.08%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFQY and VFVA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, VFQY and VFVA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VFQY or VFVA?

VFVA has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to VFQY (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFQY dropped -37.41% vs VFVA's -48.58%.

Which ETF is better, VFQY or VFVA?

On 5-year performance, VFVA leads with 9.83% vs 8.56% for VFQY. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, VFQY has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VFQY or VFVA?

Over the 5-year period, VFVA has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFQY or VFVA?

VFQY and VFVA have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VFQY or VFVA?

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.09% for VFQY.

What is the main difference between VFQY and VFVA?

VFQY is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFVA is Mid Cap Value Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.