PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFLO vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFLO vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 27.47% return, which is significantly higher than USVM's 22.48% return.


VFLO

1D
0.52%
1M
6.44%
6M
26.76%
YTD
27.47%
1Y
47.53%
3Y*
25.26%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.88%

USVM

1D
1.15%
1M
1.97%
6M
15.40%
YTD
22.48%
1Y
37.25%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.36M$4.66M$4.71M
$87.61M$73.14M$52.34M

VFLO vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VFLO
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
27.47%17.51%21.83%15.05%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
22.48%10.56%16.59%13.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and USVM is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

0.77

The correlation between VFLO and USVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFLO vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFLO
USVM

Technology

30.4%
9.6%

Energy

22.6%
5.0%

Healthcare

21.6%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
12.3%

Basic Materials

7.0%
1.7%

Communication Services

4.4%
3.0%

Utilities

3.3%
7.3%

Financial Services

0.0%
24.6%

Industrials

0.0%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
3.6%

Real Estate

0.0%
9.4%

Technology

VFLO
30.4%
USVM
9.6%

Energy

VFLO
22.6%
USVM
5.0%

Healthcare

VFLO
21.6%
USVM
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VFLO
10.8%
USVM
12.3%

Basic Materials

VFLO
7.0%
USVM
1.7%

Communication Services

VFLO
4.4%
USVM
3.0%

Utilities

VFLO
3.3%
USVM
7.3%

Financial Services

VFLO
0.0%
USVM
24.6%

Industrials

VFLO
0.0%
USVM
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

VFLO
0.0%
USVM
3.6%

Real Estate

VFLO
0.0%
USVM
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFLO vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VFLO
VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VFLO vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFLOUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.45

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.41

4.48

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.91

17.35

+7.56

VFLO vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum USVM drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFLOUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-42.38%

+24.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-8.36%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.79%

-24.34%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-7.76%

+5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.15%

-0.24%

Volatility

VFLO vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 3.07%. This indicates that VFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFLOUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

3.07%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

10.70%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

14.59%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

19.46%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

21.86%

-5.89%

VFLO vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFLO vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than USVM's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.80%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%
VFLO
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
1.07%1.60%1.20%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFLO and USVM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFLO has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to USVM (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 3-year performance, VFLO leads with 25.26% vs 19.23% for USVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 25.26% return vs 19.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.07% for VFLO.

VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. VFLO tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VFLO and 0.29% for USVM.

VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFLO and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer