VFLO vs. SCHV
Compare and contrast key facts about Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV).
VFLO and SCHV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VFLO is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. It was launched on Jun 21, 2023. SCHV is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both VFLO and SCHV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VFLO vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VFLO vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.86% | 17.51% | 21.83% | 14.59% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 3.89% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 7.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 3.89% return.
VFLO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VFLO vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VFLO vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank
VFLO
SCHV
VFLO vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFLO | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.15 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.64 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.48 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 6.91 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFLO | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.15 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.68 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between VFLO and SCHV is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VFLO vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison
VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than SCHV's 1.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.41% | 1.60% | 1.20% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.96% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Drawdowns
VFLO vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and SCHV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFLO | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -37.08% | +19.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.49% | -11.93% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -4.58% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -3.86% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 2.55% | +0.32% |
Volatility
VFLO vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VFLO | SCHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 4.13% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 8.08% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.67% | 15.42% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 14.48% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 16.91% | -1.16% |