PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFLO vs. QOWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VFLO vs. QOWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VFLO vs. QOWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
0.86%17.51%21.83%5.54%
QOWZ
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF
-11.65%7.24%33.16%6.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than QOWZ's -11.65% return.


VFLO

1D
0.48%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
0.86%
6M
5.82%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QOWZ

1D
0.39%
1M
-6.34%
YTD
-11.65%
6M
-13.33%
1Y
0.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VFLO vs. QOWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFLO and QOWZ have an expense ratio of 0.39%.


Return for Risk

VFLO vs. QOWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO
VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QOWZ
QOWZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
QOWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QOWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
QOWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
QOWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
QOWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFLO vs. QOWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFLOQOWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.04

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

0.21

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.03

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

0.07

+1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.09

0.24

+5.85

VFLO vs. QOWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the QOWZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and QOWZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFLOQOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.04

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.71

+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and QOWZ is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

VFLO vs. QOWZ - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than QOWZ's 0.29% yield.


TTM202520242023
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
1.41%1.60%1.20%0.71%
QOWZ
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF
0.29%0.28%0.66%0.00%

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. QOWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum QOWZ drawdown of -20.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and QOWZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VFLOQOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-20.36%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.49%

-17.81%

+4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-15.01%

+12.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-3.54%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

5.46%

-2.59%

Volatility

VFLO vs. QOWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) is 4.27%, while Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that VFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QOWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VFLOQOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

5.49%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

11.37%

-1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.67%

21.04%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

19.42%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

19.42%

-3.67%