PortfoliosLab logo
QOWZ vs. FDVV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QOWZ and FDVV is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QOWZ vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QOWZ:

0.68

FDVV:

0.65

Sortino Ratio

QOWZ:

1.10

FDVV:

1.08

Omega Ratio

QOWZ:

1.15

FDVV:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

QOWZ:

0.79

FDVV:

0.72

Martin Ratio

QOWZ:

2.77

FDVV:

3.05

Ulcer Index

QOWZ:

5.77%

FDVV:

3.73%

Daily Std Dev

QOWZ:

23.30%

FDVV:

15.97%

Max Drawdown

QOWZ:

-20.36%

FDVV:

-40.25%

Current Drawdown

QOWZ:

-8.39%

FDVV:

-5.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QOWZ achieves a -3.49% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's -1.30% return.


QOWZ

YTD

-3.49%

1M

4.23%

6M

-6.86%

1Y

15.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FDVV

YTD

-1.30%

1M

4.33%

6M

-4.45%

1Y

10.37%

5Y*

17.61%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QOWZ vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QOWZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QOWZ vs. FDVV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QOWZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QOWZ is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QOWZ is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QOWZ is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QOWZ is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QOWZ is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QOWZ is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDVV is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDVV is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDVV is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDVV is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDVV is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDVV is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QOWZ vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QOWZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QOWZ and FDVV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

QOWZ vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

QOWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than FDVV's 3.10% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
QOWZ
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF
0.68%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
3.10%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.63%1.04%

Drawdowns

QOWZ vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QOWZ drawdown since its inception was -20.36%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOWZ and FDVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QOWZ vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...