QOWZ vs. GARP
QOWZ (Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QOWZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GARP is a Quality Factor fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QOWZ returned -0.39% vs 31.75% for GARP. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QOWZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
QOWZ vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QOWZ achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.89% return.
QOWZ
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- -0.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.27%
GARP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.65M | $25.43M | $23.00M | |
| $51.96K | $49.43K | $74.07K |
QOWZ vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | -1.20% | 7.24% | 33.16% | 5.69% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between QOWZ and GARP is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between QOWZ and GARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QOWZ vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QOWZ
GARP
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QOWZ
GARP
Industrials
QOWZ
GARP
Healthcare
QOWZ
GARP
Communication Services
QOWZ
GARP
Financial Services
QOWZ
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
QOWZ
GARP
Consumer Defensive
QOWZ
GARP
-
Basic Materials
QOWZ
-
GARP
Energy
QOWZ
-
GARP
Real Estate
QOWZ
-
GARP
Utilities
QOWZ
-
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QOWZ vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
QOWZ
GARP
QOWZ vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QOWZ | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.26 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 2.19 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.28 | 7.99 | -8.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QOWZ vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QOWZ drawdown since its inception was -20.36%, smaller than the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOWZ and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QOWZ | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.36% | -31.34% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.81% | -13.69% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -4.34% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -7.27% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.45% | 3.75% | +3.70% |
Volatility
QOWZ vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) is 3.94%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that QOWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QOWZ | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 5.68% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 16.18% | -3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 20.02% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 22.34% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 23.92% | -4.83% |
QOWZ vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QOWZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QOWZ vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
QOWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than GARP's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QOWZ and GARP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to QOWZ (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QOWZ dropped -20.36% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 1-year performance, GARP leads with 31.75% vs -0.39% for QOWZ. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QOWZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GARP has performed better with a 31.75% return vs -0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QOWZ.
GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.25% for QOWZ.
QOWZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GARP is Quality Factor. QOWZ tracks Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QOWZ and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QOWZ and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer