VFLO vs. GFLW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VFLO (Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF) and GFLW (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFLO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while GFLW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VFLO returned 39.65% vs 29.44% for GFLW. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.

Performance

VFLO vs. GFLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly higher than GFLW's 16.55% return.

VFLO

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 10.20%
• YTD: 20.78%
• 6M: 21.57%
• 1Y: 39.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GFLW

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 10.36%
• YTD: 16.55%
• 6M: 15.42%
• 1Y: 29.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFLO vs. GFLW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF	20.78%	17.51%	-6.64%
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	16.55%	18.40%	-6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and GFLW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024	0.59

The correlation between VFLO and GFLW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VFLO vs. GFLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 87
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

GFLW

GFLW Risk / Return Rank: 42
GFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
GFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 41
GFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFLO vs. GFLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VFLO	GFLW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	1.53	+1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	2.12	+1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.26	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.00	1.98	+6.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.33	6.72	+17.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFLO vs. GFLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the GFLW Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and GFLW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VFLO	GFLW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	1.53	+1.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.65	0.78	+0.87

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. GFLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum GFLW drawdown of -24.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and GFLW.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFLO	GFLW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.79%	-24.14%	+6.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.98%	-14.95%	+9.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-0.19%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-4.64%	+2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	4.39%	-2.76%

Volatility

VFLO vs. GFLW - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) at 5.44%. This indicates that VFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFLO	GFLW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	5.44%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.05%	14.94%	-3.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.98%	19.30%	-4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.93%	24.57%	-8.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.93%	24.57%	-8.64%

VFLO vs. GFLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFLO and GFLW have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

Dividends

VFLO vs. GFLW - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than GFLW's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.01%	0.00%
VFLO Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.18%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFLO and GFLW in my portfolio?

VFLO and GFLW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFLO or GFLW?

VFLO has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to GFLW (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs GFLW's -24.14%.

Which ETF is better, VFLO or GFLW?

On 1-year performance, VFLO leads with 39.65% vs 29.44% for GFLW. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, GFLW has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VFLO or GFLW?

Over the 1-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 39.65% return vs 29.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFLO or GFLW?

VFLO and GFLW have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VFLO or GFLW?

VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.01% for GFLW.

What is the main difference between VFLO and GFLW?

VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GFLW is Large Cap Growth Equities. VFLO tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while GFLW tracks Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.