VFH vs. TRUF
VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VFH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
VFH vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VFH
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.27%
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.73%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFH vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 14.61% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 15.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFH and TRUF is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFH vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
VFH
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFH vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFH | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFH vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFH | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -3.24% | -75.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.46% | -1.10% | -17.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.69% | — | — |
Volatility
VFH vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFH | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 13.84% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 13.84% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 13.84% | +8.63% |
VFH vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFH vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.69% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, VFH and TRUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TRUF.
VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for VFH and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer