TRUF vs. KRE
TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) and KRE (SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KRE.
Performance
TRUF vs. KRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUF
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KRE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 6.43%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- YTD
- 18.47%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
TRUF vs. KRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 14.66% |
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 15.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUF and KRE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUF vs. KRE — Risk / Return Rank
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KRE
TRUF vs. KRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUF | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUF vs. KRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUF drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum KRE drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUF and KRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUF | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -68.54% | +65.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -2.61% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -21.77% | +20.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.73% | — |
Volatility
TRUF vs. KRE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUF | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.63% | 23.00% | -9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 29.68% | -16.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 31.77% | -18.14% |
TRUF vs. KRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than KRE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUF vs. KRE - Dividend Comparison
TRUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than KRE's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 2.11% | 2.45% | 2.59% | 2.99% | 2.51% | 1.97% | 2.78% | 2.21% | 2.48% | 1.40% | 1.40% | 1.80% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUF and KRE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KRE.
KRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRUF and 0.35% for KRE.
Find the right allocation for TRUF and KRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer