VFH vs. META

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VFH returned 13.15%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for META. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VFH vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly higher than META's -14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed META with an annualized return of 13.15%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.

VFH

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 4.53%
• YTD: -1.58%
• 6M: -1.74%
• 1Y: 9.92%
• 3Y*: 19.69%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: 13.15%

META

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -7.69%
• YTD: -14.03%
• 6M: -11.84%
• 1Y: -16.71%
• 3Y*: 28.18%
• 5Y*: 11.52%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	-1.58%	14.91%	30.44%	14.17%	-12.31%	35.22%	-1.96%	31.57%	-13.52%	19.99%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-14.03%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and META is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012	0.36

Return for Risk

VFH vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH

VFH Risk / Return Rank: 17
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 17
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 16

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 21
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
META Omega Ratio Rank: 20
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
META Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VFH	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	-0.51	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	-0.54	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.93	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	-0.54	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.35	-1.12	+2.47

VFH vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VFH vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, roughly equal to the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFH	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.61%	-76.74%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.75%	-33.30%	+18.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.30%	-34.15%	+16.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	-76.74%	+51.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.42%	-76.74%	+32.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.57%	-28.06%	+23.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-15.83%	-2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.65%	16.06%	-10.41%

Volatility

VFH vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 4.33%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFH	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	10.17%	-5.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.41%	26.91%	-15.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.06%	35.52%	-20.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.34%	44.04%	-24.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.55%	38.67%	-16.12%

Dividends

VFH vs. META - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than META's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF	1.48%	1.55%	1.75%	2.08%	2.31%	1.87%	2.21%	2.17%	2.30%	1.53%	1.63%	2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFH and META in my portfolio?

VFH and META have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFH or META?

META has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to VFH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs META's -76.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.