VFH vs. IYH
VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VFH returned 13.15%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for IYH. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.
Performance
VFH vs. IYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than IYH's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 13.15%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.
VFH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
IYH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
VFH vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -1.58% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -0.65% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFH and IYH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.60 |
The correlation between VFH and IYH shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFH vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFH
IYH
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
VFH
IYH
-
Technology
VFH
IYH
-
Real Estate
VFH
IYH
-
Industrials
VFH
IYH
-
Healthcare
VFH
IYH
Communication Services
VFH
IYH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VFH
IYH
-
Basic Materials
VFH
-
IYH
-
Consumer Defensive
VFH
-
IYH
-
Energy
VFH
-
IYH
-
Utilities
VFH
-
IYH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFH vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank
VFH
IYH
VFH vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFH | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.17 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 1.33 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 3.18 | -1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFH vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and IYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFH | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -43.12% | -35.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -10.64% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | -17.91% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -17.91% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.42% | -28.40% | -16.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | -3.94% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -8.96% | -9.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 4.46% | +1.19% |
Volatility
VFH vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 4.33%, while iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFH | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 4.94% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 10.64% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 15.10% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 14.96% | +4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 16.74% | +5.81% |
VFH vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFH vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison
VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than IYH's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.25% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFH and IYH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYH has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to VFH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs IYH's -43.12%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.15% vs 9.52% for IYH. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.15% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.25% for IYH.
VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.43% for IYH.
IYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFH and IYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer